|
Tradition associates Peter and Paul with
the church in Rome. They were its pillars and foundation. Rome is said to
have been the place of their martyrdom and it preserved their tombs.
However, historical criticism, aware that the evidence that the two
apostles were martyred in Rome goes back only to the last years of the
second century, has subjected their deaths to closer scrutiny. The
role of the Pope in the universal church is based on the view that the
Bishop of Rome is the successor of Peter. Protestants at the time of the
Reformation pointed out that nowhere in scripture is it said that Peter
came to Rome. We are told of Peter's crucifixion in a late apocryphal
writing. Nevertheless, present day historians think that the presence of
Peter in Rome and his martyrdom there have a reasonable foundation on a
network of circumstantial evidence: a detailed examination of a number of
New Testament tests, the earliest Christian writings (Clement of Rome),
liturgical texts and the result of archaeological excavations. One of the
most telling arguments is thought to be the connection that has recently
been established under the basilica of St. Peter and the trophy of Gains
referred to by Eusebius.
|